AN EXPLANATIVE STUDY ON THE MODULE FOR SUPERVISING AND ASSESSING EDUCATION STAFF PERFORMANCE AT PRINCIPAL EMPOWERMENT TRAINING
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.73.7870Keywords:
explanatory study; module; supervision; performance assessment; educational staffAbstract
AN EXPLANATIVE STUDY ON THE MODULE FOR SUPERVISING
AND ASSESSING EDUCATION STAFF PERFORMANCE
AT PRINCIPAL EMPOWERMENT TRAINING
ABSTRACT
Heri Supriyana
Institute for Development and Empowerment of Principals and Supervisors
The result of 2015 principal competency test shows that most of principals have not sufficient principal competency so that they have not been able to carry out their main tasks and functions properly. Likewise, the most of principals who have been appointed as principals do not yet have a Certificate of principal training, so that the most of principals do not meet the requirements to become principals. Based on this problem the Ministry of Education and Culture conducts training for strengthening principals with certain modules. The Directorate General of Teachers and Educational Personnel has written a training module for strengthening principals. These modules include the supervision module and the performance assessment of the education staff written by the author. The module has not been tested for relevance, adequacy, consistency, and sequences. In order to obtain a module for supervision and the performance assessment of teaching staff that is ready to be used in education and training, this study was conducted. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of relevance, adequacy, consistency, and sequences of the supervision module and the assessment of the performance of the education staff in the training of strengthening principals. This research is an explanative research. The data collection method uses closed questionnaire and open questionnaire techniques. The results of this study are the relevance aspects of getting a score of 3.73 (good enough), the adequacy aspect of getting a score of 3.64 (good enough), the consistency aspect of getting a score of 3.74 (good enough), the aspect of sequencing getting a score of 3.86 (good enough). Besides that from the systematic aspect of writing the category of statement "quite systematic" has the largest percentage of 77.10%, the aspect of appearance / graphic design of the category of statement "quite good" has the largest percentage of 74.23%, on the aspect of content / content category of statement "enough complete and detailed "has the largest percentage of 78.58%. The conclusion of this research is that the supervision module and the performance assessment of the education staff in the sc principal strengthening training program are good enough to be used in the principal strengthening training because they are relevant, sufficient content, consistent enough and inter-material enough sequences.
Keywords: explanatory study; module; supervision; performance assessment; educational staff.
References
Anwar Ilham. (2010). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Bahan Kuliah Online. Bandung : Direktori. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Descombe, martyn.(2003). The Good research Guide: For small-scale social research guide. Maidenhead.Philadelpia: Open University Press.
Gall,Meredith D, Gall Joyce P & Borg Walter R. (2003). Educational Reasearch: An Introduction. USA: Pearson Education.Inc.
Kemdiknas. (2008). Penilaian Kinerja Kepala Sekolah. Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan Direktor Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu dan Tenaga Kependidikan Jakarta: Depdiknas
Kemdikbud. (2017). Panduan Kerja Kepala Sekolah. Jakarta : Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan
Kemdikbud. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 Tentang Penugasan Guru Sebagai Kepala Sekolah. Jakarta : Kemdikbud
Kemdikbud. (2018). Peraturan Direktur Jendral Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Penugasan Guru Sebagai kepala Sekolah. Jakarta : Kemdikbud
Kemdiknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 13 Tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Kepala Sekolah. Jakarta : Kemdiknas
Kemenkumham. (2017). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2017 Tentang Guru. Jakarta : Kemenkumham
Lembaga Administrasi Negara. (2009). Diklat Sebagai Suatu Sistem. Jakarta : Lembaga Administrasi Negara
Moh. Nazir. (2005). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia.
Neagley,Pross L and Evans N. Dean (1980). Handbook for Effective Supervision of Instruction. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall,Inc.
Oliva Peter F. (1984). Supervision for Today’s Schools. New York: Longman.
Sekretaris Negara. (2000). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 101 Tahun 2000 Tentang Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Jakarta : Sekretaris Negara
Sekretaris Negara. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta : Sekretaris Negara
Sergiovanni, Thomas J. and Starratt, Robert J. (1979). Supervision: Human Perspectives. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Suharsimi Arikunto. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta
Suharsimi Arikunto. et.all. (2004). Evaluasi Program. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara
Suharsimi Arikunto. (2004). Penilaian Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta Jakarta
Suharsimi Arikunto. (2004). Dasar-Dasar Supervisi. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta
Winkel. (2009). Psikologi Pengajaran. Yogyakarta : Media Abadi
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors wishing to include figures, tables, or text passages that have already been published elsewhere are required to obtain permission from the copyright owner(s) for both the print and online format and to include evidence that such permission has been granted when submitting their papers. Any material received without such evidence will be assumed to originate from the authors.
